After Xmas and New Year we wait for the next feast /festival, Easter?
We need to celebrate them on the same day, reinventing time. Every moment, day, is a birth, death and resurrection. Celebrating the new decade makes better sense. We would like to wish you a new decade of real progress and sustained continuous improvement. Given the pace at which we improve, a decade makes a better time horizon to put all the improvements and disappointments in perspective. When we make the shift to REAL from linear time, time does not run out, it stretches out.
You have always been a champion of laziness and you have invented another jugglery to substantiate it. So wish you a still slower decade to laze around. Hope you cross the decade setting a new record of doing NO thing and continue to haunt us.
I am not lazy. I work very hard to remain a contrarian. I work very hard to improve my Jowar count and am very pleased with my progress, improvements.
Jowar?
It is a specially designed exercise for seniors, a combination of jogging, walking and running. I hope to join the veteran’s Olympics, post 2020. I also work very hard not to make any money, not to leave any foot prints including the carbon one, to consume less and stretch myself at the physical, mental and the spiritual planes. I fight very hard not to go in for a new car. I give more than what I take; live more with less and make sure that my output is always more than the inputs. I work on the fusion mode. I had to work very hard to make that shift from the fission mode. There is always a tendency to slip back and I have always to be on guard.
Let us continue from where we digressed. It is time to look at the other two wheels, quadrants.
You always talk in pairs, at least two balls at a time.
That is true of everything. A photon is a particle and wave. Black makes no sense without white. So here is the counter pair to Potential and Performance. We have Perfection and Psychodynamics to juggle with.
Psycho – dynamics, why the jargon after using the language of the shop floor so far?
Just to impress you!
We started with the assumption that if it takes an Einstein to understand reality, we don’t want any part of that. We have been accused of being too thin, un-academic, unsubtle etc. etc. Google it, if you want a definition. We don’t attempt definitions and we don’t have any institutional memory other than our personal ones. I have freed my memory banks of all data available by a simple search so that there is no clutter within. In the post Google age, forty hours or even less of learning is all it takes to pick up the essentials to be really successful in life. We have been testing the hypothesis for two decades now.
How do you define success?
We don’t know.
I wish I hear this more often.
Each one will have to do that according to his/her standards. For us, if you haven’t got into accidents of any kind, on the road or off the road (relationships), not been ill but improving in heath, making as much money as you have decided to make, your family and friends are also doing equally well, we would say that one is successful.
What about perfection?
Perfection is embedded in us but we don’t want to accept it. Most businesses would go out of business if we accept it including the business of education. Guardians of knowledge, custodians of the keys, the gate keepers would not relish it. Take a look at the list of gate keepers (the four classes of programmers) in the top right quadrant.
You would be thrown out at the gates itself!
There is this alignment problem between the two wheels of the learning engine. Paying attention to this will be worth the effort. This defines the learning requirements for the journey. Once we recognise the issue, the system, over time, will move towards a dynamic steady state. It is good to be confused because ultimately there will be a resolution. We will not have butter without churning the cream. It is said ask and ye shall be given.
Make it clearer. I have a low tolerance for ambiguity.
There is the ideal and our understanding of the ideal, perfection and our understanding of perfection. It is like god created us in his image and we recreate him in our image. Our image is that of the God who art in heaven, a master slave relationship which forms the master template for all our relationships. No dialogue is possible from these positions. The adult will never be born.
Should we bring in god here?
If for most people god stands for the ideal, perfection, quality, love, order, life, negentropy why not bring in God? I am yet to come across a non-believer. The atheist too is a believer since he believes that there is no god. I am yet to find an Indian who does not believe in his astrologer! For him his astrologer is god. The astrologer works on the premise that there is order and predictability not only in the case of clockwork systems, but similar order and predictability exists in the case of higher level systems too and in the very long run perfection will prevail.
In the short run all of us will be dead!
If god stands for life and we stand for death, this pair certainly needs our attention.
More juggling?
Not yet, we are getting ready for the real juggling.
What do you mean by lighthouses?
Newton (1643- 1727) continues to be our lighthouse since we are, collectively, yet to move from the clockwork paradigm. Einstein (1879-1955) ought to have stood on Darwin’s (1809- 1955) shoulders.
But the lighthouse industry is extinct. R L Stevenson (1850 – 1894, Jekyll & Hyde) foresaw the demise of the industry and left his tradition in time. His fiction was brought under the lens by Jung (1875- 1961). The artist always SEEs ahead of the scientist.
We don’t need lighthouses anymore. The new technologies mimic the metaframework of nature, much better. The second coming is that of the common Buddha, who will SEE directly without intermediation by the gate keepers. Visual literacy, not language, helps us SEE together as a community.
The basic divide is between clocks and living systems, chaos and order, Life and death, default and design?
The map shows that there is no divide but we still believe that there is a divide or unity still remains beyond our collective experience. Reality is what we belive to be true. We are co-creators of death, not life. We see inheritance in place of emergence because of the positrons we take. To co-create life we need to shift our positions for good.
There is more Ps, to be explained.
Problems. From our position, they are opportunities; the more complex they are, the more challenging. It is fun.
Prophets. Take the vision bury the dead.
Peters. The guardians of lighthouses sans the vision of the prophets drive us away from climbing up the lighthouses to take a peek. That too is in the fitness of things.
Programmers. We come preloaded with a programme to fail. The winner stakes all which includes all the past programming.
Parrots. A copy can never be better than the original but copies do come in handy. Why reinvent the wheel?
Power. There is power which makes one free and also power that leads to the making of slaves. The path to spirituality is through the thick forest of sex. Most get lost here. Narcissus to Pygmalion and Galatea set the direction of the path and we are yet to go beyond Narcissus. Sex drives the economy and the markets. Sex and power come packaged in the same container.
What about the bird and the semi dark circle in the bottom left quadrant?
This is what happens when we learn. There is a bolt of lightning that connects the small with the big, local with the global, micro with the macro, like the proverbial apple that fell on Newton, sparking the connect with that very local event with the grand design of the physical world.
What about the Red book?
The book is a pointer to the solution not the solution itself.
Why so?
All the reason, logic and analysis which have given us the technology/ Google, will not help us, if we are primarily driven by the unconscious. The unconscious will drag us down and we will never achieve take off velocity. Myths, fantasy, fiction, and hyper reality will rule us rather than reality. Artificial intelligence will continue to be more fashionable than intelligence and intuition. Magicians and pipers will continue to fool us with substitutes in place of real magic and real miracles. We need to bring back magic and miracles to our daily routine.
Real magic and miracles!
A miracle is something which is unexplainable by the known laws of nature. When we admit that there will always be unknowables but they are not our enemies, the complete system will be working with us. When the entire nature is working for us the true potential is unlocked. There is nothing hiding in the dark to pounce on us. This is freedom from the unknown. The drag is killed. There is nothing super-natural when we understand the nature of nature. We need better keys to align with the unknown and that is how we got into designing dreams.
Can we really design dreams?
Yes, if we can get rid of all the accumulated garbage. Look up Shalini here. She has been doing it for the last two years. She had very little garbage to get rid of.
When we align our SELVES / SELF, with the unconscious, we have the best ally and we are no more driven by the unknown which is a huge step to mastery of the self. We are not driven but we are on the hot seat in charge of driving the learning engine. We become the magicians, moving to the centrestage from the spectators. We are responsible to ourselves and the journey is about continual learning and improvement.We are here to learn.
There is two more Ps
Peace. If we find it within we will find it outside us too
Process. Nature is in process. We too are. Let the process go on… There are no full stops, a destination, the journey continues. The direction is fixed, the true north .
Go with the process?
Which process are you talking about, process of inheritance or emergence?
We need to see both together and the outcome , net improvements, progress ( one more P) towards true north.
It is much more complex than a Rubik’s Cube.
It is. But, there is a solution and always a still better one. and then the perfect one .We are on the path to perfection.We may never reach the perfect solution.
Are we through with the wheels? What about the engine and the driver?
We are through with the rough design. We will need to get into the detailed design of the engine and the driver. That is for another time.
We have covered the generics, not the specifics which are personal and situational.It takes some time to become comfortable with the rough design.
P.S. To our Wordsmith. If the word is your sword what is your battle?
Between the Haiti earthquake and the day of the max eclipse, it is a journey of > 1000 years to the next one of a similar kind. See you there ? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 🙂